httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Poirier" <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r804977 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ developer/ misc/ mod/ platform/ programs/ rewrite/
Date Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:49:08 GMT
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:51 -0500, "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<> wrote:
> Dan Poirier wrote:
> > After updating some of the .xml files in the docs and rebuilding, a
> > number of other files get updated by the build.  Should I check all
> > of these in as well?  Just some of them?
> >
> > (I looked for some guidance at
> > but didn't see anything.)
> If svn status shows they changed, you should, but need to determine if
> this is a legit change or a byproduct of some library dependency that
> changed.
> I'd really like to avoid us ping-ponging between two different flavors
> of some xml transformation libraries' interpretations of our xslt, for
> example.

I'll check, but I think most of these seemed reasonable results of the
.xml changes.

Why do we check in things like the .html files, though, since they can
be recreated by a build?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message