Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45276 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2007 13:14:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2007 13:14:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 54629 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2007 13:14:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54604 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2007 13:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54593 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2007 13:14:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:14:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.171.50] (HELO jupiter.hal-nine-zero-zero-zero.net) (217.160.171.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:14:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 29878 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2007 13:13:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO p54A300E7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (84.163.0.231) by jupiter.hal-nine-zero-zero-zero.net with SMTP; 3 Oct 2007 13:13:19 -0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Andr=E9_Malo?= Organization: TIMTOWTDI To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: On line docs Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:13:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4702BCBF.1060801@pc-tony.com> <43e40e000710030540v3457f60ag60e5f753429727cf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e40e000710030540v3457f60ag60e5f753429727cf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710031513.14875@news.perlig.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org * Jorge Schrauwen wrote: > I see your concern with breaking links from other sides but what about > something like this: > > every request that has a non empty referal field goes to 1.3 so links > don't break. > the onces with a blank one to a page witch a chose between 1.3 , 2.0, > 2.2, trunk? This pops the question again, what problem are we trying to solve here? And what problem would your suggestion solve anyway? ;-) Direct type-ins? How many people do that actually? Personally I either use google and find the direct link or click through the navigation. Most people I know even start with www.apache.org and click through. nd -- s s^saaaaaoaaaoaaaaooooaaoaaaomaaaa a alataa aaoat a a a maoaa a laoata a oia a o a m a o alaoooat aaool aaoaa matooololaaatoto aaa o a o ms;s;\s;s;g;y;s;:;s;y#mailto: # \51/\134\137| http://www.perlig.de #;print;# > nd@perlig.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org