httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r571928 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:30:37 GMT
* Graham Leggett wrote:

> André Malo wrote:
> >> Is   valid in XML?
> >
> > Given the proper Doctype, sure.
> > However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The
> > char entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs
> > out of the chrome scheme, for whatever reason). The doc build system
> > incorporates all HTML char entities and is the authoritative source
> > whether a document can be transformed or not.
>
> The docs at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html imply
> that modern browsers should work and that an older browser might not,
> and when Firefox didn't my first thought was that the XML was at fault,
> and not Firefox.
>
> Is it possible to update this page to clarify that one should always
> rely on the reference transformation using Xalan+Xerces because
> concluding anything is broken? At the moment, emphasis is placed on
> Xalan+Xerces being used to prevent massive diffs only.

Rephrased the browser note a bit. Is it better now?

nd
-- 
>>> Muschelflucht-Zusatzeinrichtung.
>> Shell-Escape ist ja noch klar, aber `Zusatzeinrichtung'?
> extension?
Feature.                          -- gefunden in de.org.ccc

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message