Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54870 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 12:02:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 12:02:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 8194 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 12:02:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7894 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 12:02:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 86731 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2007 11:55:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:50:35 +0200 From: Lars Eilebrecht To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Ban the phrase "reverse-proxy"? Message-ID: <20070801115035.GA32156@eilebrecht.net> References: <46B00740.7070009@rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B00740.7070009@rowe-clan.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ciphire-Security: plain X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, > What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy" > to say "gateway" in our documentation? -1 "Reverse Proxy" is a commonly used term, and I don't see a reason why we should use something else. ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht lars@eilebrecht.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org