Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44711 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 11:48:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 11:48:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 67829 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 11:47:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66798 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 11:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64777 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2007 11:47:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=X_MAILER_SPAM X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.90.230.146] (HELO cr.toftum.org) (83.90.230.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:47:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cr.toftum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DDA1ABEA2 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:46:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at toftum.dk Received: from cr.toftum.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cr.toftum.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DgASxyX4x8Vr for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cr.toftum.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 188B98043; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:46:25 +0200 From: Mads Toftum To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Ban the phrase "reverse-proxy"? Message-ID: <20070801114625.GE25974@cr> References: <46B00740.7070009@rowe-clan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B00740.7070009@rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: mutt X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:08:32PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy" > to say "gateway" in our documentation? > > We could leave one occurrence of "gateway (e.g. reverse-proxy as it was > previously documented)" per document, for clarification. > Very bad idea IMHO - reverse proxy is widely used and gateway is often used when you're describing outgoing connections, not incomming. vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org