Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38392 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2007 02:50:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2007 02:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 69559 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 02:50:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69533 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 02:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69522 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2007 02:50:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:50:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of noodlet@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.232 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.232] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:50:52 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so1933160wxd for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:50:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uCLPr4wvpKtbpbPObw+buNyhJlA1u+E0FZ8KWc4mqSxklO7MzBhVrIBroCgBn6AdhLN6WtM40zuK1kE3iHn0z+/3t/HMQ6Rl49KzN/6pRZkiPoKGhg/uni8ZdCat9+ljAogGlRaA5ed9EahnUmf2/73nPlwLXqg0pf79RhZGuxU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y/4QoKfV0pJJXsJEc9uuLt2KifwZeDoCeFEM2SLY8CYvHwJWgYLeGzN48BJRekeFl23zkBCrQ2vLsFaPtQUElDLGigJ9mfuDDsZBu63gVKMcD8xN7AuyC0c5Hs6gDhvnAqFLmJwWnnAjXeILCZfeOIMAK8KUj7zJ25AqYpueCiQ= Received: by 10.70.48.15 with SMTP id v15mr11985342wxv.1183603831705; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.112.5 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <813716b60707041950r2e7fcbf8hb215ababcbc947a8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:50:31 +0700 From: "Vincent Bray" To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Seperate issues in CommonMisconfigurations wiki page to their own wiki pages. In-Reply-To: <200707041559.05182.megaspaz@tron.megaspaz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200707041559.05182.megaspaz@tron.megaspaz.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 05/07/07, megaspaz wrote: > Basically the question is this. We are going to move the issues in the > CommonMisconfigurations wiki page to their own pages, but should we keep the > CommonMisconfigurations page or delete it completely? Rici is of the mind of > keeping it as an index of links to the new wiki pages of those issues. What > would be the consensus of the rest of you? Can't we have both? Isn't there a way to create a page as an aggregate of several others, like how wikipedia reuses article parts between articles? -- noodl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org