Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12879 invoked from network); 31 May 2007 13:49:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 May 2007 13:49:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 55374 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2007 13:49:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55082 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2007 13:49:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55071 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2007 13:49:25 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:49:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.245.8.254] (HELO pc-tony.com) (83.245.8.254) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:49:20 -0700 Received: by pc-tony.com (Postfix, from userid 504) id 76DBCCAC7B3; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 83.245.8.244 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tonys) by mail.pc-tony.com with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 14:48:59 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <45757.83.245.8.244.1180619339.squirrel@mail.pc-tony.com> In-Reply-To: References: <465C8BFF.2090505@pc-tony.com> <20070530083148.GV14245@cr> <20070531075227.GZ14245@cr> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:48:59 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Rewrite Docs From: "Tony Stevenson" To: docs@httpd.apache.org Reply-To: tony@pc-tony.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, May 31, 2007 2:30 pm, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 5/31/07, Mads Toftum wrote: > >> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:29:34AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: >> >>> Could this all be done in the official docs? Sure. Will it get done >>> there? I doubt it. This type of documentation (example configs solving >>> particular problems) is exactly the place where the wiki excels. >>> >>> So, Mads, can you explain how you see these docs evolving? >>> >>> >> I'm not going to get into a long rant about why I don't like wikis - >> one only has to review the recent thread here to see why... That being >> said, if something useful evolves in the wiki, I'm all for pulling it >> back into the httpd docs. > > I'm not a big fan of wikis either. But if you are going to look at > evidence, look at the quantity and quality of docs added to the wiki in the > last six months versus the work in the main docs. Yes, we (the regulars that is) have worked really hard to make thw wiki a productive, and viable method of collating new docs, as well as being able to use it as a staging platform for the 'real docs'. More so after the difficulty we faced in getting the wiki setup in the first place. I'm glad that the usefulness of the wiki has been realised. > > I'm not about to go deleting anything in the main docs. But if the > material on the wiki becomes a superior superset of the rewriteguide, and > nobody volunteers to push the material back to the main docs, I will be > fully in favor of deleting the rewriteguide in the main docs and linking > to the wiki. I would be more than happy to move the wiki content to the docs xml format should it be deemed the most appropriate location for it to be located. Either in its entirety or in part. > > Joshua. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org