Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
In-Reply-To: 
 <AC283435E25EE743BEA6E2E6A25F468F02CE1A1E@srv-solcon-01.solcon.local>
References: 
 <AC283435E25EE743BEA6E2E6A25F468F02CE1A1E@srv-solcon-01.solcon.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <FFEE3F1A-B53A-4B29-A7AD-1A6E7C420C16@rcbowen.com>
Cc: docs@httpd.apache.org
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com>
Subject: Re: Apache dev site outdated
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:32:34 -0400
To: dev@httpd.apache.org


On Mar 21, 2007, at 05:22, Jan van den Berg wrote:

> Just a procedural comment about:
>
>
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html
>
>
>
> The information on this page is kind of outdated: certain links =20
> don=92t work, and it deals with CVS instead of SVN.
>
> This would make it somewhat harder for aspiring contributors to get =20=

> started. I just figured it out last week; but this page sure didn=92t =20=

> help.
>
>
>
> So who keeps this page up to date? Any reason why this info isn=92t =20=

> yet updated?

I imagine that, officially, it's the responsibility of the httpd docs =20=

folks. cc'ing it over there, and perhaps someone will pick it up. =20
You're absolutely right, it does set the barrier to entry a little =20
higher.

--
The past can be like sidewalk chalk
If you will dance and pray for rain
(Caedmon's Call - Forget what you know)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org