Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90777 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2006 21:54:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2006 21:54:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 53816 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2006 21:54:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 53788 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2006 21:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 53777 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2006 21:54:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:54:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.92.104.200] (HELO mail.reppep.com) (66.92.104.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:54:21 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.reppep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC09135F86D for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:53:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.reppep.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19204-09 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:53:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.85.219.160] (salt.rockefeller.edu [129.85.219.160]) by mail.reppep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DE8135F84E for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:53:37 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:53:17 -0500 To: httpd-docs@apache.org From: Chris Pepper Subject: Significance of evaluation order? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at reppep.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I (again) banged my head against Order today. says: >Deny,Allow >The Deny directives are evaluated before the Allow directives. >Access is allowed by default. Any client which does not match a Deny >directive or does match an Allow directive will be allowed access to >the server. I'm used to 'evaluated before' meaning first match applies (firewall style), and any later matches never being checked. I can't figure out how 'before' is relevant in this sentence, since all Allow matches are checked, even if a Deny matches ('before' the Allow match). Is there a meaning to 'before' I'm just not getting, or can this be removed as confusing?? Is it a historical artifact having to do with code internals, and not relevant to .conf syntax? Regards, Chris Pepper -- Chris Pepper: Rockefeller University: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org