Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34308 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 13:50:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 13:50:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 50934 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 13:50:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50638 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 13:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50627 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 13:50:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:50:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jslive@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.231] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:50:40 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s19so462069wxc for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=IR/L+E6f7WTuCYWO9FSG2VTYIOA2BmRuZhnH+MP3V7RPORxX1YaiMbFmG+mOkw4AkwA2Buz68Mb3jkCF3qBuErsdwig2ozJxO9M/EGSJMQc6XyitGxTAdnMklO3GwyW6AMpJKH+Z1mGIy5BdADIJR0ZQuCY5jZHFudURGik2hnE= Received: by 10.78.200.3 with SMTP id x3mr2756631huf; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.142.9 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:50:18 -0400 From: "Joshua Slive" Sender: jslive@gmail.com To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.2 FAQ Docs In-Reply-To: <44D87679.6080301@pc-tony.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44D87679.6080301@pc-tony.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0e805ee698dc8bd1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 8/8/06, Tony Stevenson wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am looking at the FAQ for 2.2, and looking back at the old 1.3 version > for a comparison. > I will submit some patches and updates for the 2.2 version shortly, but I > wanted to gauge opinion first. > > I like the way that the 1.3 FAQ was broken down into more > topics/categories, and I think this helps people who are looking in a > certain topic range. > Specifically things like: > > > > Building, and Installation > Configuration > Error Log > Features (SSI, ModRewrite, SSL, etc) > I already have a handful of items that can be broken down into these > topics, and be added to the FAQ. > A lot of these items have been gleamed from time in #apache, or within the > course of my experimentation :) > > So thoughts, and comments appreciated. Go for it. The 2.2 FAQ is certainly under-loved. One note: My philosophy is that the existence of a huge FAQ that must be read by every user is a symptom of insufficient or badly designed docs. The reason a question is frequently asked may be because the docs don't sufficiently cover the topic, or the topic is too hard to find in the docs. So I would prefer not to have an enormous FAQ with tons of text. Instead, I would favor restricting it to the most crucial and common questions, and answering them mainly by providing links into the main docs. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org