Return-Path: 
 <docs-return-7172-apmail-httpd-docs-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9171 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2006 19:48:03 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2006 19:48:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 72756 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2006 19:47:49 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72220 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2006 19:47:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:docs-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:docs@httpd.apache.org>
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
List-Id: <docs.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72043 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2006 19:47:41 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:47:41 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [207.155.252.12] (HELO sheffield.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.12)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:47:40 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net
 [24.13.128.132])
	by sheffield.cnchost.com
	id OAA09793; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:47:18 -0500 (EST)
	[ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17]
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-ID: <43D5324F.6070808@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:45:19 -0600
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patch for http://httpd.apache.org
References: <20060123193708.GA3707@dochas.stdlib.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060123193708.GA3707@dochas.stdlib.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Noirin Plunkett wrote:
> It's just been pointed out on IRC that 2.0.55 is no longer the best
> available version of Apache.
> 
> Rather than scrapping the 2.0.55 announcement entirely, here's a
> proposed patch.

Your language looks good.  Note that you can borrow the current language
of 1.3.34, of course, to reflect that they should look elsewhere (in fact
the 1.3 announce probably says 2.0 is best, and it's time to update that.)

I will be rolling a 2.2 candidate tonight

<waits for folks to catch their breath>

no, but in a couple days, irrespective of all 'showstoppers' which are not
(that is, any showstopper that isn't a regression from 2.2.0 isn't a show
stopper to 'the next somewhat better release') - and hopefully folks are
interested in reviewing and committing patches that fix the 2.0 -> 2.2.0
regressions over the next day or few.

My thought is that if we can announce 2.0 and 2.2 nearly simultaniously,
it will avoid the hurd's roll from 2.2.0 -> 2.0.56, something we've seen
in the past w.r.t. 2.0 and 1.3.

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org