httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <>
Subject Re: /docs/2.1/
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:16:04 GMT
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:53:43AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>Paul Querna wrote:
>>>Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>>>>This leaves the question about what to do with the trunk documentation.
>>>>Should  be made work perpetually?
>>>>Or should the manual from trunk simply never be on-line?
>>>I vote for /docs/trunk/ always pointing to the current trunk.
>>--1 ... it should point to the current stable shipping version, e.g.
> Why would trunk point to the current stable shipping version? 

D'uh oh(!)  Yes, a /docs/trunk/ isn't a bad idea.  I shortened that as
I read it, and thought you were speaking of /docs/ (vanilla).

>>"Hey user, THIS is the version you should be using already, but here are
>>the links to old versions and current experimental branch".
> Right now, we have two experimental branches. This is the problem.

But we have /docs/2.1/ (which should be /docs/2.2/ IMHO) - right?  That
solves the issue?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message