Return-Path: 
 <docs-return-6861-apmail-httpd-docs-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87483 invoked from network); 23 May 2005 01:54:30 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2005 01:54:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 64796 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2005 01:54:28 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64762 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2005 01:54:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:docs-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:docs@httpd.apache.org>
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
List-Id: <docs.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64742 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2005 01:54:27 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from force-elite.com (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com)
 (216.255.199.145)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:54:24 -0700
X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com
Received: from [10.0.0.142] (10.0.0.142:51966)
	by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
	id <SB4010> for <docs@httpd.apache.org> from <chip@force-elite.com>;
	Sun, 22 May 2005 18:54:16 -0700
Message-ID: <429137C8.9010607@force-elite.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 18:54:16 -0700
From: Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: docs and JIRA?
References: <429130D4.9040702@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <429130D4.9040702@apache.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Jason Lingohr wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why we don't use JIRA to track doco stuff?

I believe Bugzilla is used for documentation, because Bugzilla is used
for the main httpd bug tracking.  I am not entirely opposed to using
Jira (+0 maybe?), but it makes sense to have the documentation team
share the same bug tracker as the code, since then bugs can easily be
moved between groups.

> Just wondering as I've seen in the recently-joined infra list that it
> appears to be used there for www.apache.org doco stuff.

I am open to using Jira for httpd, aka not opposed, but someone would
have to head a migration up, and do the work to convert the existing
Bugzilla bugs, etc.

-Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org