httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Astrid Keßler <k...@kess-net.de>
Subject Re: outdate
Date Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:30:20 GMT
Yoshiki wrote:

> André Malo <nd@perlig.de> writes:

>>> Wouldn't this be better using real xml fields, which we could then
>>> transform in the docs so that readers of translations would know if they
>>> were reading the most recent version?
>>
>> Well, BTDT.
>> Here's a suggestion:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/~nd/manual/ru/new_features_2_0.html
>>
>> The message needs to be translated, of course.
>> Opinions?

> I think it would be nicer if the revision numbers are in it,
> like: Original revision: 1.3  Translated revision: 1.1
> Many people probably have no clue what revision number means
> but it will give you a rough idea of how out of date the
> translation is.

I don't think so. As Joshua said, revision numbers are for developers
only. Users might misinterpret them with release numbers. And if I
understand the discussion right, the revision numbers are stored in the
xml file. This well for developers.

Kess

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message