Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 07:25:17 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo <nd@perlig.de>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org,docs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/conf httpd-win.conf
Message-Id: <20031117072517.3caac97f.nd@perlig.de>
In-Reply-To: <20031117013311.85832.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
References: <20031117013311.85832.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
Organization: TIMTOWTDI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

* rbowen@apache.org wrote:

>   Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments
>   regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of
>   questions about this.

I'm -0 on it, because using ScriptInterpretersource registry without further
explanation of the flaws is dangerous. Using ScriptInterpreterSource
registry-strict without knowing what it does is silly.
However, let us document it better and just refer to the docs, if at all.
Second objection is: The httpd.conf may not become a doc replacement. It
disturbes me a bit, that (a) people get such a big default config which gives
wrong impressions about how to use the apache. ("complex", <IfModule over all
and everywhere etc.).

YMMV. nd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org