httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joshua Slive <>
Subject Re: What's wrong with 2.1 mod_status documentation?
Date Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:38:10 GMT

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
> It is true that the document itself looks a bit old, though.
> There is an obsolete comment mentioning ServerType
> directive.  Perhaps 'child' should be changed to 'worker'
> since 'child' implies fork/exec.  But other than that,
> mod_status file looks fine to me.  Is it OK to change them
> (remove <note> about standalone mode and inet mode and do
> s/child/worker/) and remove warning at the top of the
> document?


I went through and added that warning to a bunch of docs before 2.0 was
released.  Essentially anything that I thought had substantially changed,
but I hadn't had a chance to check in detail, got the warning.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message