Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20264 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2003 22:02:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20202 invoked from network); 6 May 2003 22:02:35 -0000 From: "Vincent de Lau" To: Subject: RE: Antwort: "About the Documentation" (primarily: prerequisites) Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 00:01:25 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:joshua@slive.ca] > On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 Michael.Schroepl@telekurs.de wrote: > > (By the way: these glossary targets are used like > > "
Access Control
", > > thus they display a hovering effect when you move the > > mouse over them, as if they were links. > > Using > > "
Access Control
" > > would be the way to avoid this effect, which might mislead > > the reader who currently expects this to be clickable.) > > I don't understand why browsers do that. If there is no HREF, then they > shouldn't pretend it is a link. The empty could work, but I > consider that semantically ugly. You could also use: "
Access Control
" Not sure which browsers support this, but it is part of HTML 4.01 (http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html). Vincent de Lau vincent@delau.nl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org