httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: any written guidelines on dealing with 2.0/2.1 doc issues?
Date Fri, 18 Apr 2003 13:41:51 GMT
* Jeff Trawick wrote:

> I just added a new log format to mod_log_config in the development
> branch and updated the doc in the development branch to mention it.
> 
> Should the doc mention that the feature is new with 2.2 and then put the
> minor doc change in both branches to keep the doc the same as much as
> possible?

No. If it's only in 2.1 then it should occur only there (think of 
mod_ident, mod_auth[nz] etc)
That's what we're doing at the moment. I'd say consensus ;-)

> (If the feature is subsequently merged into the stable branch, then both
> references would be changed to 2.0.??.)

yep.

nd
-- 
die (eval q-qq[Just Another Perl Hacker
]
;-)
# André Malo, <http://pub.perlig.de/> #

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message