Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 86510 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2003 14:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 86499 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 14:06:12 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo Subject: Re: HERE is a Simplified Chinese Manual Transalation Project going on. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: TIMTOWTDI References: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:00:36 +0100 To: docs@httpd.apache.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Yes! X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N * kajaa zhang wrote: > HERE is a Simplified Chinese Manual Transalation Project going on. >=20 > See: > Homepage: http://kajaa.bbs.us/ami/amiproject.html > Progress: http://kajaa.bbs.us/ami/amiprogress.html > CVSROOT=3D:pserver:cvsuser:anonycvs@kajaa.bbs.us:/ami Well, took a look over it - I can't read it (don't care, my fault :-),=20 looks great. > And, we'd like to dedicate to the Apache Project. > Help, to introduce this project to Apache. I have to apologize, but I don't know very much about the different chinese= =20 dialects (?). Someone startet already a Traditional Chinese translation=20 (I'm note sure about the state, see=20 ). Does it make=20 sense to translate into both dialects? I think, we should clear that,=20 perhaps you may work together. However, there are some technical issues, that happen if/when the=20 translation goes into the apache repository: - the xml files are named by language not by charset, so it would be foo.xml.zh (?) - the html files go similar. The charset extension for non-iso-8859-1=20 documents comes after the language extension for better negotiation, i.e. foo.html.zh.gb2312 - there are a lot of linebreaks, perhaps they can be shortened, but this is= =20 only cosmetics :) - the notes the CVS revision number of the=20 particular english original document, so it can't be 2.0 ;-) - The documents need review, I'm not sure, how we solve that; any ideas=20 someone? nd --=20 package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =3D>__PACKAGE__]}~; # Andr=E9 Malo # http://pub.perlig.de # --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org