httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: docs on APACHE_2_0_BRANCH
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2002 13:32:52 GMT
* Joshua Slive wrote:

> I have moved the docs-2.0 checkout on httpd.apache.org to the
> APACHE_2_0_BRANCH tag so that it will contain the correct docs to go along
> with 2.0.  I moved what used to be called docs-2.0 to docs-2.1, but I
> haven't yet linked it from anywhere.

Fine.

For the 2.0 ist probably too late, but should we consider to create a 
directory structure like

/docs/<version>

? (<version> == major version aka 2.1, 2.2 etc)

> Perhaps a link from
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/
> would be appropriate, but I don't think it is necessary to put it in the
> main menu until we get closer to a 2.1 release.

ACK.

> As far as documentation development on this new system, any changes that
> are not specific to new features in 2.1 should be made both to HEAD and to
> the branch.  If the change is substantial, it might be a good idea to
> commit to head first, then wait a few days for feedback before committing
> to the branch.  But I don't think we need any strict rules.

At this point a question. Since 2.1 is stated as "development version" what 
are the docs in HEAD now actually for? 2.1 or 2.2?
We also need to change all occuring version numbers "2.0" (in headings, 
breadcrumb etc.) to appropriate values (2.1 or 2.2 ;-)

nd
-- 
Da fällt mir ein, wieso gibt es eigentlich in Unicode kein
"i" mit einem Herzchen als Tüpfelchen? Das wär sooo süüss!
 
                                 -- Björn Höhrmann in darw

Mime
View raw message