Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95987 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2002 03:01:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95976 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2002 03:01:01 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021027204304.023b3f48@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: admin%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:56:23 -0600 To: docs@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Authentication in 2.0 Cc: Apache Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2002 03:01:04.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[4112ED30:01C27E2E] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yes Rich, it's an issue, and it was one of the 'big' drivers in my pushing to begin preparation of a stable 2.2 release. [When we say 'stable', we are even talking about module API stability.] The Auth changes get a little harry for the upgrader's existing httpd.conf, at least for a sub version point-bump. The thought is we will migrate these changes to 2.1 development, make sure the server is stable (API and all) and release 2.2. If there is a change in the API, along comes 2.4. Users know what to expect. If we decide we have some "really big" change that will totally confound users or introduce a whole new way of doing things, that becomes a major bump. The hope developers have expressed is that we roll out 2.2 very soon, within a month to three. It's better to push forward and get Justin's new auth out there (and improve Apache's reputation on module stability) rather than trying to revert changes like mod_authz_hostname back to mod_access. What does that mean for docs? Probably a fork in the road there too. Of course many modules have few changes, so dealing with a branch is probably cleaner than keeping up two separate repositories. But the choice affects everyone on this list contributing docs, so please offer your thoughts. The branch would look like; apache-2.0 MAIN branch - current development, 2.1 stays here. \--- APACHE_2_0_BRANCH [when we declare 2.1, we 'freeze' 2.0] \--- APACHE_2_2_BRANCH [as we prepare to release 2.2, we branch] \--- APACHE_2_1_BRANCH [once we move on to 2.3/2.4] Another thought is that APACHE_2_1 is never 'stable', so there will be no need to branch it when we begin '2.3' work on the MAIN branch. In any case, I sort of see new docs working this way; APACHE_2_0_BRANCH - maintenance for older docs. MAIN - -new- documentation not-yet-ready-to-release. APACHE_2_2_BRANCH - introduce ready-to-release changes. Finally, see httpd-2.0/ROADMAP for the 'working' description of how all this might work. Docco committers, please share your thoughts! Bill At 08:33 PM 10/27/2002, Rich Bowen wrote: >I know I've been a little out of it for the last little bit. I'm finding >some things that seem a little undesired on the >httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0 site, in particular regarding authentication. >There are a number of docs on there that refer to auth changes in >2.0.44, which is confusing some folks, since 2.0.44 is not released yet, >and they are still trying to struggle along with 2.0.43 or earlier. >http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_auth.html is a 404, and it's >not clear what folks should do upon encountering that particular >problem. > >Now, I apologize if this has come up before, and been resolved to >everyone's satisfaction, but if a module goes away in a particular >version (even assuming that version has been released!) shouldn't there >be some period during which there's some kind of place holder telling >people what that functionality has been replaced with? > >It seems to me that mod_auth's functionality has been replaced with >several other modules - mod_auth_basic, mod_authz_groupfile, >mod_authn_file - and apart from having to redo the auth tutorial >document, this means some added confusion for the users, and I'd like to >minimize their frustration as they transition to the new way of thinking >about things. And, of course, I have to redo my ApacheCon presentation, >also. *sigh*. > >Thoughts? > >-- >Pilgrim, how you journey on the road you chose >To find out where the winds die and where the stories go > --Pilgrim (Enya - A Day Without Rain) > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org