Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8351 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2002 16:58:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8339 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2002 16:58:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "i.t" Reply-To: i.t@ithum.de Organization: i.t webdevelopment To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: httpd-docs-2.0 - mod_proxy.xml 1.12 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:58:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <3D8AF1D9.AE09C957@Golux.Com> <200210061710.01851.i.t@ithum.de> <3DA05DC7.6060105@slive.ca> In-Reply-To: <3DA05DC7.6060105@slive.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200210061858.10404.i.t@ithum.de> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N msg Sonntag, 6. Oktober 2002 17:59 by Joshua Slive: > I guess I still don't understand your point. Your earlier comment > certainly read to me like "if you need to do anything serious, you > should use squid in place of mod_proxy" (which, in turn, comes pretty > close to "mod_proxy sucks"). > > I don't understand what you mean by "should simply give a hint that > squid is a dedicated cache". well - let's drop the whole line; that's seems to me simply the best i.t -- . ___ | | Irmund Thum | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org