httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: Auth: Start the httpd-2.1 branch finally?
Date Sun, 13 Oct 2002 03:47:48 GMT wrote:
> In all of these cases, there was a developer or three, who created a CVS
> tree either in their home directories, or in the main CVS area.  They made
> the major changes that they wanted to see made, and then they announced
> the changes to the list, and invited people to help them make the projects
> better.

Except for the fact that in all the above cases, the branch being "deviated"
from was a solid, robust and reliable codebase. It was *time* to start
a new branch, knowing that the current codebase was, at a very deep
level, very robust and "baked".

Is 2.0?

*That* is my only concern regarding a 2.1 branch. It leaves 2.0 in
a not-quite-there state. It's the idea that 2.0 is "dropped" so work
can progress on 2.1.

PS: I don't see this as another Shambhala situation, by the way.
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [|]
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message