Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82614 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2002 21:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82590 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 21:24:36 -0000 Message-ID: <3D864C10.60305@slive.ca> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:24:32 -0400 From: Joshua Slive User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Suggestion: add revision number to docs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Michael.Schroepl@telekurs.de wrote: > Why not make use of this information at this point as well? > The HTML files are being generated anyway ... I side with Justin on this one. Yes, the information is useful, but that doesn't mean we have to place it in each file. There is a perfectly good place to get this information already: CVS. We don't place revision numbers/etc in the source code, I don't see a need for them in the docs. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org