Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 32957 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2002 16:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 32933 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 16:25:48 -0000 Message-ID: <3D7E1D08.8010709@slive.ca> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:25:44 -0400 From: Joshua Slive User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/xsl pagetypes.xsl common.xsl References: <20020910012048.59385.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <3D7DF723.604@slive.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Andr=E9 Malo wrote: > The main intention was not to produce unnecessary traffic and spreading= > so many big emails. I'm connected to the web with small bandwidth (ISDN= ) > but bought some memory for better working recently ;-)=20 But regeneration of the html files does not cause any network bandwidth=20 unless the content changes. Making a change in common.xsl will cause=20 all files to be regenerated, but only the ones that were really affected = by the change will have diffs. > If there are no other words on this, I'm going to revert this change. > sorry for wasting bandwidth... Thanks. And no need to apologize; this is how the commit-then-review=20 process is supposed to work. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org