Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8604 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2002 17:28:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8586 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 17:28:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3D78E59C.2050406@slive.ca> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:27:56 -0400 From: Joshua Slive User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/css manual.css References: <20020906005415.9594.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <3117522776.20020906175257@perlig.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Andr=E9 Malo wrote: > attached a patch for manual.css, that merges the double defined section= s > and removes the CSS validator warnings. > Also adjusted the sidebar top position (it's dependant on font-size). Got it. >> 3. Try out a funny shade of brown for . What'd'ya think? >=20 > +1 from me ;-) Yes, it's pretty much exactly the color you suggested and I shot down=20 before. >=20 > some other thoughts: >=20 > should we consider to move the xml docs to another directory? For > example, if you request > , you get at least in > Mozilla the xml document which will be transformed but misses all the > definitions from external documents (I believe, it's a security feature= > of mozilla or so ;-). Mozilla now has several problems with the xml+xslt. When I try to=20 transform even a document that doesn't have the   problem, Mozilla=20 seems to ignore all lists and paragraphs and just shows the text in each = section as one big blob. I'm not terribly concerned at this point. It=20 would be nice if we can get it to work, but as long as the generated=20 html version is correct, that is all that really matters. As far as seperating the directories, that is something we might want to = consider at one point. But I'm not really concerned about the specific=20 problem you mentioned. We support a single URL for each document:=20 mod/directives.html in that case. People can't go and use some=20 arbitrary related URL and expect it to work. >=20 > Finally I would include at least the 100% loose style for users, which > don't like the sidebar and/or fix fonts. Done. This one should probably be designated as the default for=20 printing, but I didn't have time to test that with a bunch of browsers,=20 so I didn't do that. > index.html: according to your CVS log entry, I think it's ok, if we're > working on it... ;-) I'm not, but I hope "we" are. ;-) Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org