Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:35:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qualifications of the Reviewer of Translated Doc
In-Reply-To: <20020831154257.23238.qmail@inscyber.net>
Message-ID: <20020902193334.S39639-100000@foem.leiden.webweaving.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


> I am concerned about the qualifications of the reviewer of translated doc.
> Is the Apache HTTP Server Documentation Project just request for a fluent
> speaker for the relevant language to have a review on the translated doc?
> Do the reviewers need to be famous or well-reputated? If not, then why do
> we need reviewers? We can just let our friends to put their names there.

We try to get at least one completely indepedent review by a person fluent
in the languange before we add anything to the repository.

However note that this is an open mailing list - and we always solicit and
encourage feedback, bugs (you -can- file a bug against the documentation!)
if a translation is somewhere lacking.

The more people participate the merrier !

Dw


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org