From docs-return-3787-apmail-httpd-docs-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Thu Sep 05 23:07:29 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 90066 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2002 23:07:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 90040 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 23:07:28 -0000 Subject: Re: Ready to commit the new docs :-) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo References: <3D77D74D.3080008@codefaktor.de> Organization: TIMTOWTDI Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 To: docs@httpd.apache.org Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 01:06:35 +0200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N * Erik Abele wrote: > I have just finished reviewing the new docs from Andre. All in all > everything > went fine, only a few minor changes were needed to get it all working > correctly. > I also merged in all the changes from the last days, which were > missing in Andres > docs. there are a lot of things, I provided a 50 KB patch some days ago, so that the resulting docs do validate against the xhtml strict DTD. I probably should rebuild that against the current docs. however, I hope you took the xml/xsl from http://test.perlig.de/apdoc/manual/build/ and http://test.perlig.de/apdoc/manual/style/ resp. one of the archives packages...? > c) We now have some more images in manual/images: > down.gif > feather.gif > left.gif > right.gif > up.gif > > These should be converted to PNG too (as all the others). the feather.gif may cause a problem, because some browsers don't handle the transparency in PNG correctly (e.g. opera) Also I'm not sure about the right.gif. I placed it in the toc if the link doesn't go down but to another document. (like in mpm_winnt or so) > d) I had to make some minor changes to common.dtd to get the new docs > validating correctly: for example I defined two new elements to > support the newly used -, -tags. would be nice, if you could add a , too ;-) If this is in, I may step through the files and turn the bogus to ... > e) The example-boxes use 
...
to > define the bg-color. > Unfortunately Mozilla and IE (didn't check the others) don't > wrap the text within the 
-tags, since it is pre-defined, ha. With
> smaller window-sizes we therefore get lines which reach over the
> background box.
> 
> To see this live, try
> http://test.perlig.de/apdoc/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.html

hmm. no. 
 does the work. I'd strongly recommend
modifying mod_rewrite.xml. i.e. use real tables etc.
But this can be done later...

> Joshua, I also had to change build.xml, can you please commit the
> attached patch; thanks ;-) I will go on and commit the whole stuff in
> the next hour if nobody raises any objections.

please, please take a look at the build.xml at
. I realized another ant
caching problem (posted one or two days before...) and fixed that by
modifying the build.xml. 

Another Point: which CSS did you use? I really don't think that we
should take every provided variant but a few ;-) 

nd
-- 
s;.*;aaaaaoaaaoaaaaooooaaoaaaomaaaa:a:alataa:aaoat:a:a:a
maoaa:a:laoata:a:oia:a:o:a:m:a:o:alaoooat:aaool:aaoaa
matooololaaatoto:aaa:o:a:o:m;;s:\s:\::g;y;mailto:;
\40\51/\134\137|ndparker ;;print;

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org