Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
From: "Vincent de Lau" <vincent@delau.nl>
To: <docs@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: RE: wacky docs look - take two
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:24:12 +0200
Message-ID: <DKEIKAOJIMFHPDHKCAOIMEDMCJAA.vincent@delau.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3D54827B.6030301@slive.ca>
Importance: Normal

> So here is what I'd like to hear:
>
> - Is this the right overall direction?
IMHO: yes

> - Is it too flashy/complicated?
The only disadvantage I noticed is that it's useless on 640/480. But I don't
think that should be show stopper.

> - Does it work in everybody's various browsers?  (It is supposed to work
> at least back to Netscape 4, but I haven't tested it.)

What do we want to support?

> If people like it, what the process be for adopting it?  Should we go
> ahead and do it now, and fix up any problems later.  Or should we wait
> and fix things now.  Or possibly, should we wait until the rest of the
> manual is converted to xml?

I would wait for all the docs to be in XML, since converting twice is not a
good idea.
However, it might be usefull for people to be able to contribute to the
development. Maybe it is helpfull to post an archive with all the CSS/XSL
stuff in it so that people can experiment with it.

Vincent de Lau
 vincent@delau.nl


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org