Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2469 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2002 16:21:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2405 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 16:21:36 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.5 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:21:38 +0200 Subject: Re: Antwort: Re[2]: New style/de.xml From: Erik Abele To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >> Well I've looked on some howtos. Neither "verwandt" not >> "verwendet" does fit in ervery case. So I've choosen >> "referenzierte" now. >> This means "Module/Direktiven, auf die Bezug genommen wird". >> Any comments? > > I still believe that "verwandt" is better for modules, > while "verwendet" is okay for directives (and IMHO > better than "referenzierte"). > > Regards, Michael > Perhaps a simple solution: What's about 'betreffend'? It's more neutral than 'verwandt' or 'verwendet' and not as sesquipedalian as 'referenzierte' ?! So -1 for 'referenzierte', 'verwendet' and 'Relatierte Modulen'. -erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org