httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vincent de Lau" <vinc...@delau.nl>
Subject RE: Issues with XML / XSLT stuff
Date Fri, 26 Jul 2002 01:24:18 GMT
If my previous patch applied OK, here are two more.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Slive [mailto:joshua@slive.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:46 PM
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Vincent de Lau wrote:
>
> > DTD's
> > -----
> > section/related elements
> >   The section element relies on related, which is not in common.dtd.
> >   Also, in the current definition, you can have multiple
> related elements
> >   within one section.
> >   I propose to move the related and directivelist element to
> common.dtd and
> >   change the section element to:
>
> Sounds good.
>
> >   <!ELEMENT section (title, related?, (section | %blocktags;)*)>
> >   This would have the following results on module docs:
> >   - enforces title element, which was optional but could occur multiple
> > times
>
> I'm not sure whether or not we want to allow sections without titles.  I
> guess we can ban them for now and see how it goes.
>
> >   - allows related element to be used
> >   I've discovered one page that will not conform after the changes:
mod_rewrite
> >   uses a section element to group an image with a caption and does not
use a title element.
>
> That can be fixed.
>

see dtd_fix.patch

> >
> > XSLT
> > ----
> > general
> >   common.dtd calls a template for a meta element, which does
> not exist in
> >   any DTD or current XML file. Should it be removed?
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> > manualpage
> >   The title in the generated page is prepended with 'Apache Module'.
> >   Should we change this in 'Apache Manual:' or discard it?
> >   Changing it would require an update to all the message files.
>
> Discard.  My mistake, certainly.
>
see xslt_fix.patch

Vincent de Lau
 vincent@delau.nl

Mime
View raw message