Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87404 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2002 02:27:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87392 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 02:27:52 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 22:28:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Rich Bowen To: Subject: Re: xml build system In-Reply-To: <20020508115654.L24386@apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 8 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 07:28:37AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Agreed, but if most of the developers were to use an XML browser, the > > conversion could be done, say, once a week, by someone with the > > know-how, rather than having to have all of the individuals involved > > know how to do it. > > The rationale for standardizing on a specific XML toolset is > so that the conversions in the repository don't consistently > flip-flop. > > Right now, if everyone were to use their own transformation > tools and versions, the diffs in the repository would be > horrendous. > > I would back the rationale for updating the HTML at the same > time as the XML so that our website could be properly > updated when the docs change. -- justin OK, this is a very good point, and I had not thought of that. I guess we can presume that everyone with commit access has the necessary skills, and access to tools, to do this. I just wish that we could put something in a cvs checkin script to do this for us. For example, on my cvs server, in $CSVROOT/commitinfo, I run a Perl syntax check on all .pm and .pl files that get committed - basically a perl -cw - and reject commits that don't pass. Using a similar mechanism, could we not run a XML->HTML conversion on every commit of a xml file, and then guarantee that the same tools are being used every time? Is there any reason *not* to do this? -- Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com http://kenya.rcbowen.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org