Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36765 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2002 16:21:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36752 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2002 16:21:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:28:10 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Joshua Slive To: Apache Documentation Project Subject: RE: New to the list and ready to help out. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-X-Sender: slive@finance.commerce.ubc.ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Brad Miller wrote: > > > > > About the strictness of it, do we want to make sure that everything already > > > written validates or do we want to go > > > back through stuff and modify it (if necessary) to conform to the DTD? > > > > There is no requirement that what has already been written is the > > benchmark for all development to come. I would rather Joshua and I have > > to redo what we have done if there is a better way to do it. > > By the way, Joshua, you like the way I volunteered you to do more work? > Heh. What I meant here is that it would be preferable to make things > better at this stage than have to redo everything again at a later date, > once we are already done. +1! Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org