Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 9750 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2001 11:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 9739 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2001 11:49:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3BEFB7AA.5C6CB908@Golux.Com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:51:06 -0500 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: tables References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joshua Slive wrote: > > There seems to be an unwritten rule that s are banned > from the httpd docs. I guess this is not surprising since some > of the docs were written back in a time where table support in > browsers could not be counted on. The result is some ugly > monstrosities like the listing of % directives in > mod_log_config.html. True, to a point If text-only clients can now all reliably handle tables, cool. But if they still look like crap, then I'm opposed to changing them -- because someone setting up a server doesn't necessarily have network access nor a running server yet. :-) -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org