Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-docs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 34324 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2001 11:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-docs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apache-docs@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for apache-docs@apache.org Received: (qmail 99732 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2001 10:48:37 -0000 To: members@apache.org Cc: , Subject: Re: New Dinamic Load Balancing system for Apache References: <20010920143351.E27003@Lithium.MeepZor.Com> <0b6401c1420d$25de53a0$93c0b0d0@roweclan.net> From: davidw@dedasys.com (David N. Welton) Date: 21 Sep 2001 12:48:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0b6401c1420d$25de53a0$93c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Message-ID: <87zo7on7ju.fsf@dedasys.com> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "William A. Rowe, Jr." writes: > This sounds like an interesting project. Understand that the ASF > does not endorse or adopt any project development under the GNU > regime, simply because it interferes with commercial distribution, > which the ASF actively encourages. To be precise, and a bit picky, the GNU license does not interfere directly with commercial distribution (see Redhat for example), it interferes with proprietary distribution. Of course, a lot of commercial distributions want to be proprietary, and the GNU license does hinder that, whereas the Apache license does not. -- David N. Welton Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/ Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/ Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/ Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org