Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-docs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 34338 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2001 04:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-docs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apache-docs@apache.org Received: (qmail 34329 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2001 04:17:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:17:43 -0400 From: Allan Liska X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.48f) Personal Reply-To: Allan Liska Organization: http://www.allan.org X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5138535443.20010914001743@allan.org> To: apache-docs@apache.org Subject: Re[2]: Security Docs In-reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello Rich, Thursday, September 13, 2001, 10:57:57 PM, you wrote: RB> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote: >> Hello, >> >> If no else is working on it, I would like to take a stab at the >> following action item: >> >> * Improving the "security docs" >> >> - More content and better organisation. RB> Where do you see the organization lacking/confusing? RB> I find that there is some inconsistency in the "what goes where" RB> department, at times, but I'd like to hear your perspective on this RB> also. I have some ideas, but they are not fully meshed yet. I'll put together an outline of my proposed restructuring and post it to the list for comment over the weekend. Thanks! allan -- allan allan@allan.org http://www.allan.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org