Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-docs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 47107 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2001 02:07:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-docs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apache-docs@apache.org Received: (qmail 47098 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 02:07:42 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7p2 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-PGP-KeyID: F88341D9 Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 04:07:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Lars Eilebrecht To: apache-docs@apache.org Subject: Re: AddIconByType vs AddIcon X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N According to Carlos: > If I remember correctly, the reason why AddIconByType is preferred is > because you have multiple file extensions. If you addIcon, you would have > to add the icon for each individual mime type. If you addIconByType, you do > it only once And it allows you to specify an icon for a type without any extension, e.g., "AddIconByType (BIN,/icons/binary.gif) application/octet-stream". ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht - Any bugs found in this message are lars@hyperreal.org - simply evidence of its handcrafted nature. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org