httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Pepper <>
Subject Re: What's the name
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:16:32 GMT
At 11:09 AM -0400 2001/08/17, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>>  Joshua Slive wrote:
>>  >
>>  > What is the name of this thing we are documenting?
>>  >
>>  > 2. Which of the following should we use in the docs to refer to
>>  > this project?
>>  > a) Apache HTTP Server
>>  That is the one..
>Right.  The problem is that this is rather long and stodgey for use in the
>docs.  It has no obvious abbreviation, other than "Apache" (which means
>ASF) or "the Server" (which is ambiguous; does that mean the hardware,
>the OS, or httpd?).
>Not to go overboard on this issue, but let's take an example:
>"Anyone who can write to the directory where Apache is writing a log file
>can almost certainly gain access to the uid that the server is started as,
>which is normally root."
>"the server" should probably be replaced with "httpd".  But what
>should be done with "Apache"?
>I'm starting to lean towards just using "Apache" as the short-form
>of "Apache HTTP Server" wherever the meaning is not ambiguous.

	I like httpd -- I also am bothered by using a name that's 
close to an executable, but not quite right. I don't like "Apache" by 
itself, because I  think we should try not to cloud the line between 
the original (httpd) project, and other Apache projects.

It's Out! Mastering Mac OS X: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message