Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-docs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 27927 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2001 18:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-docs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apache-docs@apache.org Received: (qmail 27917 invoked from network); 12 May 2001 18:38:20 -0000 Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Slive X-X-Sender: To: Rich Bowen cc: Subject: Re: A Patchy Server and the FAQ In-Reply-To: <200105121825.f4CIPwK01232@rhiannon.rcbowen.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 12 May 2001, Rich Bowen wrote: > > And this is what I've believed for a long time. But at ApacheCon, Ryan Bloom > (or it might have been Roy Fielding) talked about the real origin of the name > Apache, and about the falacy that it came about for the above reason. Of > course, it is our own FAQ that is perpetuating the falsehood. > The best source I know (besides directly asking Brian) is http://www.linux-mag.com/2000-04/behlendorf_02.html It sounds like the pun wasn't the original inspiration, but it has been there from the start, so its not inappropriate to think of it as part of the origin of the name. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org