Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact apache-docs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list apache-docs@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for apache-docs@apache.org Received: (qmail 85218 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2001 09:05:46 -0000 Received: from mail6.svr.pol.co.uk (195.92.193.212) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2001 09:05:46 -0000 Received: from modem-18.eldacar.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.179.18] helo=fenris.webthing.com) by mail6.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 14NWjc-0002Re-00 for apache-docs@apache.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:05:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 1543 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Jan 2001 21:58:48 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 21:58:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:58:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Kew To: new-httpd@apache.org cc: apache-docs@apache.org Subject: Re: Language Negotiation: "No Acceptable Variant" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Joshua Slive wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Koen Holtman wrote: > > Wait a minute: is the problem that these many people send, say > > > > Accept-language: fr > > > > when they in fact speak en+fr and prefer en, or is the problem that their > > browsers do not send any accept-language at all? > > > > The problem is people who send > Accept-language: de > or > Accept-language: en-gb ISPs will supply browsers configured to the language they expect their users to speak. So naturally languages like de and fr are widespread. I guess the same argument goes for en-gb, though surely that at least should be read as implying a lower preference generic-en? Brits *can* read merkin, even those of us who prefer english. -- Nick Kew