Return-Path: <slive@finance.commerce.ubc.ca>
Mailing-List: contact apache-docs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list apache-docs@apache.org
Received: (qmail 31870 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2000 01:11:47 -0000
Received: from finance.commerce.ubc.ca (root@137.82.66.119)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2000 01:11:47 -0000
Received: from finance.commerce.ubc.ca (IDENT:slive@finance.commerce.ubc.ca
 [137.82.66.119])
	by finance.commerce.ubc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA32383
	for <apache-docs@apache.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:11:47 -0800
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:11:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Joshua Slive <slive@finance.commerce.ubc.ca>
To: apache-docs@apache.org
Subject: Re: Order deny,allow,help,me,please
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012121335100.5566-100000@koj.rkbloom.net>
Message-ID: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012121708130.32363-100000@finance.commerce.ubc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:

> This would break a lot of working installations, and it increases the
> order dependance in Apache.  IMHO that would be a bad thing.
> 

Yah, this would be a bad idea because it would be hard to determine what
would happen with a mixture of Allows/Denys in .htacces/<location>/etc.
I'll just try to clarify the docs a little with a couple extra examples.

Joshua.