httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From f...@locus.apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts name-based.html
Date Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:54:12 GMT
fanf        00/10/19 11:54:12

  Modified:    htdocs/manual/vhosts name-based.html
  Log:
  Be more emphatic about the number of browsers that don't do Host: headers.
  We love you, IE2.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.14      +6 -6      httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html
  
  Index: name-based.html
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html,v
  retrieving revision 1.13
  retrieving revision 1.14
  diff -u -u -r1.13 -r1.14
  --- name-based.html	2000/09/13 20:14:47	1.13
  +++ name-based.html	2000/10/19 18:54:11	1.14
  @@ -33,12 +33,12 @@
   what name it is being addressed as. Apache 1.1 and later support this
   approach as well as the old IP-address-per-hostname method.</P>
   
  -<P>The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a
  -practically unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and
  -requires no additional hardware or software. 
  -The main disadvantage is that the client must support this part of the
  -protocol. Almost all browsers do, but there are still small numbers of
  -old browsers in use who do not. This can cause problems, although a possible
  +<P>The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a practically
  +unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and
  +requires no additional hardware or software. The main disadvantage is
  +that the client must support this part of the protocol. Almost all
  +browsers do, but there are still tiny numbers of very old browsers in
  +use which do not. This can cause problems, although a possible
   solution is addressed below.</P>
   
   <H2>Using name-based virtual hosts</H2>
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message