Message-ID: <37E0521E.4F1E1086@wahoo.com.tw>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:12:46 +0800
From: Kevin Lo <kevlo@wahoo.com.tw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apache-docs@apache.org
Subject: Re: New CVS modules for Apache documentation
References: <37DFBBCD.38122498@Golux.Com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: apache-docs-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org

Hi, Ken,

How are you doing! About two months ago, I discussed you
about I finished translating part of Apache docs into Chinese,
do you remeber me? Because I quit my previous job, so if you
sent me emails to this address kevinlo@linpus.com.tw, it didn't work.

Well, your cvs site is OK now? If so, how can I put the docs on it,
thanks.

Rest regards,
Kevin Lo.

Ken Coar wrote:

> Coming soon to a Web near you..
>
> The question was asked on the Apache development list whether
> it would be worthwhile to move the Apache docco out of the
> source tree and into a separate CVS module, allowing a different,
> wider, and probably less restricted group of people to work on
> the documentation.
>
> The answer seems to be yes, that's a good idea.
>
> I see either two or four different development areas:
>
> 1. the actual httpd documentation, and the API
> 2. same as [1], only split into 1.3 and 2.0 trees
>
> Any thoughts?  Ideas for module names (httpd-docs and httpd-api,
> httpd-1.3-docs, httpd-docs-1.3, et cetera)?
> --
> #ken    P-)}
>
> Ken Coar                    <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/>
> Apache Software Foundation  <http://www.apache.org/>
> "Apache Server for Dummies" <http://ASFD.MeepZor.Com/>