Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache-docs-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 2612 invoked by uid 6000); 15 Sep 1999 15:31:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 2603 invoked from network); 15 Sep 1999 15:31:51 -0000 Received: from i.meepzor.com (HELO Mail.MeepZor.Com) (root@204.146.167.214) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 1999 15:31:51 -0000 Received: from Golux.Com (ss06.nc.us.ibm.com [32.97.136.236]) by Mail.MeepZor.Com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA32158; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:34:24 -0400 Message-ID: <37DFBBCD.38122498@Golux.Com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:31:25 -0400 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apache-docs@Apache.Org Subject: New CVS modules for Apache documentation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: apache-docs-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org Coming soon to a Web near you.. The question was asked on the Apache development list whether it would be worthwhile to move the Apache docco out of the source tree and into a separate CVS module, allowing a different, wider, and probably less restricted group of people to work on the documentation. The answer seems to be yes, that's a good idea. I see either two or four different development areas: 1. the actual httpd documentation, and the API 2. same as [1], only split into 1.3 and 2.0 trees Any thoughts? Ideas for module names (httpd-docs and httpd-api, httpd-1.3-docs, httpd-docs-1.3, et cetera)? -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar Apache Software Foundation "Apache Server for Dummies"