Return-Path: <apache-docs-owner-apache-docs-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apache-docs-archive@hyperreal.org
Received: (qmail 29012 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Dec 1998 16:56:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 28996 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1998 16:56:42 -0000
Received: from gw-nl1.philips.com (@192.68.44.33)
  by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 1998 16:56:42 -0000
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1])
          by gw-nl1.philips.com with ESMTP id RAA27035
          for <apache-docs@apache.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:56:37 +0100 (MET)
          (envelope-from R.Kraaij@pbc.be.philips.com)
Received: from smtprelay-eur1.philips.com(130.139.36.3) by gw-nl1.philips.com
 via mwrap (4.0a)
	id xma027033; Tue, 1 Dec 98 17:56:37 +0100
Received: from bcs11.pbc.be.philips.com (bcs11.bcs.cs.philips.com
 [130.139.40.111])
	by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.8.5/8.6.10-1.2.2m-970826) with ESMTP id
 RAA00992
	for <apache-docs@apache.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:56:36 +0100 (MET)
Received: from exchvs01.bcs.cs.philips.com (exchvs01.bcs.cs.philips.com
 [130.139.40.10])
	by bcs11.pbc.be.philips.com (8.6.10/8.6.10-1.2.1a-961023) with ESMTP id
 RAA09348
	for <apache-docs@apache.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:55:55 +0100
Received: by exchvs01.bcs.cs.philips.com with Internet Mail Service
 (5.0.1460.8)
	id <W4XFSFWT>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:56:05 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <29F16C82368FD111914F00805F858E4F0168CE81@exchvs01.bcs.cs.philips.com>
From: "Kraaij, Reinder " <R.Kraaij@pbc.be.philips.com>
To: "'apache-docs@apache.org'" <apache-docs@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Case Studies
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:56:04 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: apache-docs-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: apache-docs@apache.org

Look's like the life is back into it :o)



> 	* broadening/facilitating access to the
> 	  existing docs (e.g., a document "portal"
> 	  as has been suggested; creating numerous
> 	  format versions such as PDF, SGML)
> or do we need other levels/types of documentation?
> And if the latter, what?

I would suggest a Pure, Html Based Documenation with a logical
,splittable,Structure

	- Thereby elimination various layout overload, thus focussing on the
Main goal
	- Downloadable in parts,  making it browsable offline, on there own
Home Server , thus elemenating the need of pdf


As far as 'if read point 1 till 4 is accepted for the portal, and we'r still
doubting about point 5.


			- Reinder