httpd-dev mailing list archives: February 2018

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load
Luca Toscano   Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load Thu, 01 Feb, 03:38
Luca Toscano     Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load Sat, 03 Feb, 23:37
Yann Ylavic       Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load Sun, 04 Feb, 01:27
Luca Toscano         Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load Sun, 04 Feb, 10:17
Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
Greg Stein   Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 08:00
Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group     AW: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 08:36
Yann Ylavic       Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 08:48
Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group         AW: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 08:52
Yann Ylavic           Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 14:43
Stefan Eissing             Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 14:53
Greg Stein       Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 08:58
Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel.
Mark Blackman   Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Thu, 01 Feb, 09:29
Yann Ylavic     Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Thu, 01 Feb, 12:36
Mark Blackman       Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Thu, 01 Feb, 15:32
Yann Ylavic         Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Thu, 01 Feb, 16:15
Yann Ylavic           Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Thu, 01 Feb, 16:27
Mark Blackman             Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Thu, 01 Feb, 16:49
Jim Jagielski               Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Fri, 02 Feb, 14:19
Mark Blackman                 Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Fri, 02 Feb, 16:12
Jim Jagielski             Re: [Bug 62044] shared memory segments are not found in global list, but appear to exist in kernel. Fri, 02 Feb, 14:10
Re: svn commit: r1807709 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.xml modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c modules/ssl/ssl_private.h
Stefan Eissing   Re: svn commit: r1807709 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.xml modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c modules/ssl/ssl_private.h Thu, 01 Feb, 12:38
Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c
ste...@eissing.org   Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 14:58
Yann Ylavic     Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 15:11
Stefan Eissing       Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 15:15
Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group         AW: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 15:18
Yann Ylavic         Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 15:21
Yann Ylavic           Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 15:23
Stefan Eissing             Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c Thu, 01 Feb, 16:02
Yann Ylavic New ServerUID directive Thu, 01 Feb, 17:54
Exonetric   Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 08:04
Jim Jagielski   Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:14
Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group     AW: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:25
Yann Ylavic       Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:42
Stefan Eissing         Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:44
Yann Ylavic           Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:50
Yann Ylavic             Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:52
Jim Jagielski               Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 16:52
Yann Ylavic                 Re: New ServerUID directive Sat, 03 Feb, 01:05
Stefan Eissing                   Re: New ServerUID directive Sun, 04 Feb, 10:49
Jim Jagielski                     Re: New ServerUID directive Sun, 04 Feb, 14:19
Stefan Eissing                   The Case for Managed Domains Sun, 04 Feb, 11:51
Steffen                     Re: The Case for Managed Domains Sun, 04 Feb, 12:35
Jim Jagielski                       Re: The Case for Managed Domains Sun, 04 Feb, 14:57
Luca Toscano                         Re: The Case for Managed Domains Mon, 05 Feb, 01:43
Eric Covener                           Re: The Case for Managed Domains Mon, 05 Feb, 01:47
Steffen                             Re: The Case for Managed Domains Mon, 05 Feb, 06:36
William A Rowe Jr                             Re: The Case for Managed Domains Mon, 05 Feb, 17:05
William A Rowe Jr                     Re: The Case for Managed Domains Tue, 06 Feb, 07:13
Stefan Eissing                       Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 11:04
Yann Ylavic                         Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 12:25
Eric Covener                           Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 12:34
Stefan Eissing                           Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 12:42
Daniel                             Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 15:12
Stefan Eissing                               Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 20:06
Roy T. Fielding                                 Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 20:21
Stefan Eissing                                   Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 21:23
Eric Covener                         Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 12:28
Stefan Eissing                           Re: The Case for Managed Domains Fri, 09 Feb, 12:36
Jim Jagielski                   Re: New ServerUID directive Sun, 04 Feb, 14:32
Yann Ylavic                     Re: New ServerUID directive Sun, 04 Feb, 23:25
Stefan Eissing                     Re: New ServerUID directive Mon, 05 Feb, 12:38
Jim Jagielski                       Re: New ServerUID directive Mon, 05 Feb, 19:09
Stefan Eissing             Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 15:28
Yann Ylavic               Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 15:43
Stefan Eissing                 Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 16:11
Dirk-Willem van Gulik           Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:52
Stefan Eissing       Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 14:42
Jim Jagielski         Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 16:45
Helmut K. C. Tessarek   Re: New ServerUID directive Fri, 02 Feb, 17:09
Michael   Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 09:21
Yann Ylavic     Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 10:13
Michael       Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 10:27
Yann Ylavic         Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 11:14
Helmut K. C. Tessarek       Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 10:45
Stefan Eissing         Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 10:54
Michael           Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 11:17
Yann Ylavic           Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 11:17
Jim Jagielski           Re: New ServerUID directive Tue, 06 Feb, 13:25
Re: svn commit: r1822879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
Joe Orton   Re: svn commit: r1822879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Fri, 02 Feb, 08:44
William A Rowe Jr     Re: svn commit: r1822879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon, 05 Feb, 15:06
Joe Orton       Re: svn commit: r1822879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Tue, 06 Feb, 09:58
bugzi...@apache.org Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2018/02/04] Sun, 04 Feb, 07:15
Yann Ylavic Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 07:24
Jim Jagielski   Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 13:29
Yann Ylavic     Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 14:18
Yann Ylavic       Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 14:23
Eric Covener         Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 14:33
Yann Ylavic           Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 14:48
Eric Covener             Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 15:14
Jim Jagielski       Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 15:14
Stefan Eissing         Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 17:17
Yann Ylavic           Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Tue, 06 Feb, 17:59
Jim Jagielski             Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Wed, 07 Feb, 12:47
Yann Ylavic               Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Wed, 07 Feb, 13:57
Jim Jagielski                 Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Wed, 07 Feb, 14:08
Yann Ylavic               Re: Which server id for mod_proxy_lb? (was: New ServerUID directive) Wed, 07 Feb, 14:04
Can I Unsubscribe mailing group
thinkh...@gmail.com   Can I Unsubscribe mailing group Tue, 06 Feb, 11:53
Yann Ylavic     Re: Can I Unsubscribe mailing group Tue, 06 Feb, 12:03
thinkh...@gmail.com   Can I Unsubscribe mailing group Tue, 06 Feb, 11:54
Pavel Janík mod_ssl: support for forced renegotiation on timeout or bytes? Wed, 07 Feb, 08:40
Michael Issues with instdso.sh, build-1/libtool (and perhaps gnu.libtool) Wed, 07 Feb, 14:50
William A Rowe Jr   Re: Issues with instdso.sh, build-1/libtool (and perhaps gnu.libtool) Wed, 07 Feb, 18:40
Michael Felt     Re: Issues with instdso.sh, build-1/libtool (and perhaps gnu.libtool) Thu, 08 Feb, 22:19
William A Rowe Jr       Re: Issues with instdso.sh, build-1/libtool (and perhaps gnu.libtool) Fri, 09 Feb, 05:02
Michael Felt         Re: Issues with instdso.sh, build-1/libtool (and perhaps gnu.libtool) Tue, 13 Feb, 22:19
Graham Leggett BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 14:52
Michal Karm   Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 14:57
Jim Jagielski   Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:04
Jim Jagielski     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:07
Graham Leggett     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:07
Jim Jagielski       Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:16
Jim Jagielski         Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:18
Graham Leggett         Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:18
Graham Leggett           Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:24
Jim Jagielski             Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:33
Graham Leggett               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 17:00
Dirk-Willem van Gulik             Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 15:34
Graham Leggett               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 16:46
William A Rowe Jr                 Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 17:04
Jim Jagielski                   Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 17:12
Jim Jagielski                     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 17:33
Yann Ylavic                       Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 17:52
Joe Orton                         Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 09:41
Jim Jagielski                           Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 12:47
William A Rowe Jr                           Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 15:03
Graham Leggett                             Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 18:06
William A Rowe Jr                               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 18:19
Jim Jagielski                             Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 18:26
Ruediger Pluem                               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 19:13
William A Rowe Jr                                 Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 19:42
Stefan Eissing                                   Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Fri, 16 Feb, 09:01
William A Rowe Jr                               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 19:41
William A Rowe Jr                       Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 18:34
Graham Leggett                         Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 18:41
Jim Jagielski                           Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 19:01
William A Rowe Jr                             Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 19:08
Jim Jagielski                               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 19:13
Graham Leggett                   Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 17:39
William A Rowe Jr                     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 18:36
Graham Leggett                       Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 18:45
William A Rowe Jr                         Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 07 Feb, 18:46
Graham Leggett                           Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 08 Feb, 15:51
Jim Jagielski                             Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 08 Feb, 20:39
William A Rowe Jr                               Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Fri, 09 Feb, 05:04
William A Rowe Jr                                 Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Fri, 09 Feb, 05:12
Graham Leggett                                   Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Tue, 13 Feb, 14:19
William A Rowe Jr                                     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Tue, 13 Feb, 15:32
Yann Ylavic                                     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Tue, 13 Feb, 17:32
William A Rowe Jr                                       Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 15 Feb, 05:06
Yann Ylavic                                     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Tue, 13 Feb, 17:36
Jim Jagielski                                     Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 14 Feb, 12:43
Graham Leggett                                       Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Wed, 14 Feb, 12:44
Jim Jagielski                                 2.6/3.0 yet again... Fri, 09 Feb, 13:10
Stefan Eissing                                   Re: 2.6/3.0 yet again... Fri, 09 Feb, 14:36
Ruediger Pluem                         Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 08 Feb, 09:34
Yann Ylavic                           Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long Thu, 08 Feb, 11:09
Re: svn commit: r1807876 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1807876 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c Thu, 08 Feb, 19:37
Luca Toscano     Re: svn commit: r1807876 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c Thu, 08 Feb, 19:50
Yann Ylavic       Re: svn commit: r1807876 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c Thu, 08 Feb, 19:54
bugzi...@apache.org Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2018/02/11] Sun, 11 Feb, 07:15
Luca Toscano mod-proxy-uwsgi in trunk questions Sun, 11 Feb, 19:55
Yann Ylavic   Re: mod-proxy-uwsgi in trunk questions Sun, 11 Feb, 20:15
Stefan Eissing HostGroup patch Mon, 12 Feb, 14:05
Re: Time for 2.4.30? (Was: Re: 2.4.x STATUS needs you!)
Nic Jansma   Re: Time for 2.4.30? (Was: Re: 2.4.x STATUS needs you!) Tue, 13 Feb, 18:23
Jim Jagielski     Re: Time for 2.4.30? (Was: Re: 2.4.x STATUS needs you!) Wed, 14 Feb, 12:40
Graham Leggett       Re: Time for 2.4.30? (Was: Re: 2.4.x STATUS needs you!) Wed, 14 Feb, 12:42
William A Rowe Jr       Re: Time for 2.4.30? (Was: Re: 2.4.x STATUS needs you!) Thu, 15 Feb, 03:16
Yann Ylavic Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Wed, 14 Feb, 11:03
Graham Leggett   Re: Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Wed, 14 Feb, 12:28
Yann Ylavic     Re: Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Wed, 14 Feb, 13:05
Graham Leggett       Re: Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Wed, 14 Feb, 13:39
Stefan Eissing         Re: Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Wed, 14 Feb, 14:49
William A Rowe Jr           Re: Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Thu, 15 Feb, 03:14
William A Rowe Jr     Re: Scope of RemoteIPProxyProtocol* (was: svn commit: r1824211 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) Thu, 15 Feb, 03:11
Jim Jagielski T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Wed, 14 Feb, 13:22
Daniel Ruggeri   Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Thu, 15 Feb, 13:45
Eric Covener     Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Thu, 15 Feb, 13:49
Jim Jagielski       Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Thu, 15 Feb, 14:17
Yann Ylavic         Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Thu, 15 Feb, 22:25
Yann Ylavic       Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Thu, 15 Feb, 17:28
Jim Jagielski     Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Thu, 15 Feb, 14:17
Daniel Ruggeri     Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal Sat, 17 Feb, 17:40
Sharan F Apache EU Roadshow CFP Closing Soon (23 February) Wed, 14 Feb, 15:18
Re: svn commit: r1824221 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/mod/mod_remoteip.xml modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824221 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/mod/mod_remoteip.xml modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c Wed, 14 Feb, 15:20
Stefan Eissing something amiss in 2.4.x Wed, 14 Feb, 16:16
Graham Leggett   Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Wed, 14 Feb, 16:19
Stefan Eissing     Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Wed, 14 Feb, 16:22
Yann Ylavic   Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Wed, 14 Feb, 16:36
Stefan Eissing     Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Wed, 14 Feb, 17:08
Yann Ylavic       Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Thu, 15 Feb, 00:03
Stefan Eissing         Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Thu, 15 Feb, 13:03
Yann Ylavic           Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Thu, 15 Feb, 13:11
Stefan Eissing             Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Thu, 15 Feb, 13:16
Yann Ylavic               Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Thu, 15 Feb, 13:28
Jim Jagielski               Re: something amiss in 2.4.x Thu, 15 Feb, 13:43
Re: svn commit: r1824306 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/balancer-slotmem-selection.diff
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824306 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/balancer-slotmem-selection.diff Thu, 15 Feb, 13:42
Stefan Eissing     Re: svn commit: r1824306 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/balancer-slotmem-selection.diff Thu, 15 Feb, 13:44
Re: svn commit: r1824339 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_regex.h server/core.c server/util_pcre.c
Ruediger Pluem   Re: svn commit: r1824339 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_regex.h server/core.c server/util_pcre.c Fri, 16 Feb, 09:50
Yann Ylavic     Re: svn commit: r1824339 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_regex.h server/core.c server/util_pcre.c Fri, 16 Feb, 11:19
Re: svn commit: r1824303 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/protocol.c
Ruediger Pluem   Re: svn commit: r1824303 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/protocol.c Fri, 16 Feb, 09:57
Yann Ylavic     Re: svn commit: r1824303 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/protocol.c Fri, 16 Feb, 11:35
Ruediger Pluem       Re: svn commit: r1824303 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/protocol.c Fri, 16 Feb, 11:40
Yann Ylavic         Re: svn commit: r1824303 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/protocol.c Fri, 16 Feb, 11:46
Christian Folini Backporting 1823047 for 2.4.30 / 2.4.3x? Fri, 16 Feb, 10:47
Yann Ylavic   Re: Backporting 1823047 for 2.4.30 / 2.4.3x? Fri, 16 Feb, 11:54
Yann Ylavic     Re: Backporting 1823047 for 2.4.30 / 2.4.3x? Fri, 16 Feb, 11:56
Christian Folini       Re: Backporting 1823047 for 2.4.30 / 2.4.3x? Mon, 19 Feb, 04:59
Christian Folini       Re: Backporting 1823047 for 2.4.30 / 2.4.3x? Wed, 28 Feb, 12:24
Re: svn commit: r1824457 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824457 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h Fri, 16 Feb, 12:52
Re: svn commit: r1824460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Fri, 16 Feb, 13:00
Re: svn commit: r1824496 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824496 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Fri, 16 Feb, 14:31
Re: svn commit: r1824465 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/mod_ssl_policy.diff
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824465 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/mod_ssl_policy.diff Fri, 16 Feb, 16:34
Stefan Eissing     Re: svn commit: r1824465 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/mod_ssl_policy.diff Sat, 17 Feb, 17:20
Stefan Eissing       Re: svn commit: r1824465 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/mod_ssl_policy.diff Mon, 19 Feb, 09:42
Yann Ylavic         Re: svn commit: r1824465 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/mod_ssl_policy.diff Mon, 19 Feb, 09:54
Stefan Eissing           Re: svn commit: r1824465 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/mod_ssl_policy.diff Mon, 19 Feb, 10:12
Re: svn commit: r1824533 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Yann Ylavic   Re: svn commit: r1824533 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Fri, 16 Feb, 16:55
Graham Leggett [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Sat, 17 Feb, 23:11
Stefan Eissing   Re: [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Mon, 19 Feb, 09:14
Graham Leggett     Re: [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Mon, 19 Feb, 10:24
Stefan Eissing       Re: [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Mon, 19 Feb, 10:26
Jim Jagielski       Re: [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Mon, 19 Feb, 16:04
Yann Ylavic   Re: [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Mon, 19 Feb, 09:45
Graham Leggett     Re: [Patch] proof of concept - teaching hooks to yield where sensible Mon, 19 Feb, 10:33
bugzi...@apache.org Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2018/02/18] Sun, 18 Feb, 07:15
Stefan Eissing open letter Sun, 18 Feb, 11:26
Steffen   Re: open letter Sun, 18 Feb, 12:40
Stefan Eissing   Re: open letter Sun, 18 Feb, 16:14
Steffen   Re: open letter Sun, 18 Feb, 16:33
Eric Covener     Re: open letter Sun, 18 Feb, 16:52
Steffen Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 13:44
Eric Covener   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 14:20
Steffen   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 14:44
Steffen   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 15:13
Eric Covener     Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 16:39
Steffen   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 16:53
Eric Covener     Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 16:57
Steffen       Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Fri, 23 Feb, 18:01
William A Rowe Jr         Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Fri, 23 Feb, 18:24
Gregg Smith           Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 25 Feb, 20:17
William A Rowe Jr             Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 25 Feb, 23:30
Gregg Smith               Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Mon, 26 Feb, 00:31
Steffen   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Sun, 18 Feb, 17:10
Steffen   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Mon, 19 Feb, 11:38
Jan Ehrhardt     Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Tue, 20 Feb, 11:12
Steffen   Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues Tue, 20 Feb, 11:32
Steffen HTTPD :: our use of Let's Encrypt trademark ?⁩ Sun, 18 Feb, 18:59
Steffen Apache httpd 2.4.30-dev available for testing Mon, 19 Feb, 13:39
DRugg...@primary.net [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Mon, 19 Feb, 14:54
Stefan Eissing   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Mon, 19 Feb, 15:26
Jim Jagielski   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Mon, 19 Feb, 15:45
Graham Leggett     Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Mon, 19 Feb, 15:47
Jim Jagielski       Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Mon, 19 Feb, 16:05
DRugg...@primary.net     RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 00:28
Jim Jagielski       Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 02:44
Jim Jagielski         Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 12:09
DRugg...@primary.net           RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 13:39
Jim Jagielski             Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 14:07
Jim Jagielski   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 12:06
William A Rowe Jr     Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 20 Feb, 18:33
Rainer Jung   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Wed, 21 Feb, 00:55
Rainer Jung   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Wed, 21 Feb, 20:34
Stefan Eissing     Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Thu, 22 Feb, 09:19
Jim Jagielski   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Tue, 27 Feb, 13:00
Daniel Ruggeri   Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Wed, 28 Feb, 12:32
Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/
Ruediger Pluem   Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Mon, 19 Feb, 15:33
Jim Jagielski     Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Mon, 19 Feb, 15:47
Yann Ylavic       Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Mon, 19 Feb, 16:27
Yann Ylavic         Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Mon, 19 Feb, 16:37
Daniel Ruggeri       RE: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Tue, 20 Feb, 14:35
Jim Jagielski         Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Tue, 20 Feb, 16:01
Yann Ylavic           Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Tue, 20 Feb, 16:05
Daniel Ruggeri     RE: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ Tue, 20 Feb, 14:29
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Aug 201858
Jul 2018150
Jun 2018103
May 2018152
Apr 2018385
Mar 2018317
Feb 2018368
Jan 2018158
Dec 2017137
Nov 2017161
Oct 2017211
Sep 2017159
Aug 201776
Jul 2017242
Jun 2017251
May 2017172
Apr 2017232
Mar 2017189
Feb 2017364
Jan 2017569
Dec 2016382
Nov 2016171
Oct 201699
Sep 2016138
Aug 2016267
Jul 2016155
Jun 2016309
May 2016164
Apr 2016210
Mar 2016414
Feb 2016353
Jan 2016236
Dec 2015317
Nov 2015321
Oct 2015497
Sep 2015327
Aug 2015217
Jul 2015243
Jun 2015388
May 2015293
Apr 2015210
Mar 2015151
Feb 201567
Jan 2015227
Dec 2014164
Nov 2014139
Oct 2014140
Sep 2014161
Aug 2014167
Jul 2014192
Jun 2014174
May 2014121
Apr 2014287
Mar 2014292
Feb 2014264
Jan 2014243
Dec 2013265
Nov 2013377
Oct 2013233
Sep 2013291
Aug 2013186
Jul 2013253
Jun 2013240
May 2013266
Apr 2013152
Mar 2013188
Feb 2013252
Jan 2013258
Dec 2012131
Nov 2012168
Oct 2012106
Sep 2012169
Aug 2012279
Jul 2012184
Jun 201293
May 2012135
Apr 2012220
Mar 2012347
Feb 2012391
Jan 2012445
Dec 2011293
Nov 2011505
Oct 2011242
Sep 2011315
Aug 2011401
Jul 2011224
Jun 2011202
May 2011283
Apr 2011141
Mar 2011308
Feb 2011301
Jan 2011238
Dec 2010189
Nov 2010332
Oct 2010305
Sep 2010265
Aug 2010227
Jul 2010173
Jun 2010483
May 2010165
Apr 2010161
Mar 2010283
Feb 2010240
Jan 2010238
Dec 2009262
Nov 2009530
Oct 2009530
Sep 2009568
Aug 2009259
Jul 2009364
Jun 2009265
May 2009330
Apr 2009196
Mar 2009358
Feb 2009221
Jan 2009339
Dec 2008338
Nov 2008182
Oct 2008378
Sep 2008237
Aug 2008162
Jul 2008120
Jun 2008257
May 2008320
Apr 2008406
Mar 2008203
Feb 2008356
Jan 2008423
Dec 2007336
Nov 2007270
Oct 2007382
Sep 2007520
Aug 2007391
Jul 2007208
Jun 2007267
May 2007309
Apr 2007278
Mar 2007308
Feb 2007316
Jan 2007304
Dec 2006280
Nov 2006237
Oct 2006394
Sep 2006287
Aug 2006250
Jul 2006570
Jun 2006313
May 2006367
Apr 2006548
Mar 2006408
Feb 2006328
Jan 2006438
Dec 2005613
Nov 2005711
Oct 2005598
Sep 2005456
Aug 2005776
Jul 2005457
Jun 2005384
May 2005321
Apr 2005359
Mar 2005466
Feb 2005380
Jan 2005206
Dec 2004398
Nov 2004538
Oct 2004371
Sep 2004539
Aug 2004527
Jul 2004325
Jun 2004468
May 2004317
Apr 2004234
Mar 2004606
Feb 2004357
Jan 2004358
Dec 2003344
Nov 2003580
Oct 2003336
Sep 2003272
Aug 2003262
Jul 2003323
Jun 2003424
May 2003447
Apr 2003355
Mar 2003684
Feb 2003570
Jan 2003534
Dec 2002443
Nov 2002531
Oct 2002749
Sep 2002901
Aug 2002802
Jul 2002716
Jun 2002910
May 20021024
Apr 20021369
Mar 20021093
Feb 20021143
Jan 20021069
Dec 2001682
Nov 20011268
Oct 20011110
Sep 20011258
Aug 20011708
Jul 20011052
Jun 2001737
May 2001644
Apr 2001957
Mar 2001611
Feb 20011465
Jan 20011416
Dec 2000906
Nov 20001082
Oct 20001016
Sep 2000645
Aug 2000729
Jul 20001016
Jun 20001602
May 20001092
Apr 20001358
Mar 20001504
Feb 2000586
Jan 2000836
Dec 1999590
Nov 1999601
Oct 1999746
Sep 1999378
Aug 19991034
Jul 1999678
Jun 1999626
May 1999619
Apr 1999697
Mar 1999678
Feb 1999325
Jan 1999794
Dec 1998575
Nov 1998407
Oct 1998475
Sep 1998737
Aug 1998557
Jul 1998907
Jun 1998858
May 1998958
Apr 19981234
Mar 19981320
Feb 19981328
Jan 19981686
Dec 1997879
Nov 19971103
Oct 19971078
Sep 19971171
Aug 19971881
Jul 19971809
Jun 19971820
May 1997622
Apr 1997938
Mar 1997685
Feb 19971176
Jan 19971927
Dec 19961420
Nov 1996798
Oct 1996605
Sep 1996644
Aug 1996994
Jul 19961617
Jun 19961747
May 19961210
Apr 19961102
Mar 1996698
Feb 19961000
Jan 1996550
Dec 1995832
Nov 1995628
Oct 1995589
Sep 1995715
Aug 19951049
Jul 1995413
Jun 1995255
May 1995390
Apr 1995998
Mar 1995699