httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long
Date Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:07:40 GMT
On 07 Feb 2018, at 5:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> I believe the issue are the various defines in
> mod_proxy.h (eg: PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE. These
> have been bumped up in trunk but have not been
> backported to 2.4 due to perceived API/ABI issues.

Looking at https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1621367 it seems two changes
are being made, one is to increase the sizes, the second is to accept a truncated value.

In theory, the “accept a truncated value” will work around the problem and be backport-able,
is that true?

Regards,
Graham
—


Mime
View raw message