httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: can we haz backports?
Date Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:26:42 GMT
Vetos must be justified... for solid, technical reasons.

One cannot just cast a -1 vote because one doesn't like
something. Way too often I see being blocking stuff
instead of working to *unblock* stuff.


> On Jan 12, 2018, at 6:32 AM, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
> 
> Now mod_md contains features which are not supported anymore ! 
> 
> For SSL only config mod_md is not usable anymore, see https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/2018-01-11-update-regarding-acme-tls-sni-and-shared-hosting-infrastructure/50188
<https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/2018-01-11-update-regarding-acme-tls-sni-and-shared-hosting-infrastructure/50188>

> 
> Propose to change mod_md regarding above, now I vote -1. 
> 
> On windows I advise LE-Win-Simple with its selfhosting option when you have SSL only.

> 
> 
> 
> Op 12 jan. 2018 om 12:14 heeft Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de <mailto:stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>>
het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> Team,
>> 
>> the frequency that people keep on asking me when ACME 
>> support in Apache will be released is going up. For 
>> this to happen, two backports need 1(!) more vote:
>> 
>> 1. core/mod_ssl: Add new flag int to module struct.
>>     existing votes: icing, ylavic
>> 2. mod_md: backport of ACME (Let's Encrypt) support. 
>>     existing votes: icing, jim
>> 
>> Is anyone planning to review this in the next days? Maybe,
>> since everyone has limited time, coordinating this might
>> be helpful?
>> 
>> Hoping to hear back from you.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Stefan
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message