Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01618200D53 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:06:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id F3DED160C1B; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 461ED160C0A for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:06:25 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 19365 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2017 14:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19355 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2017 14:06:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:06:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 476D01A16B1 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:06:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=greenbytes.de header.b=XlTKFvUt; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=greenbytes.de header.b=XlTKFvUt Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkbI0WY0zm4P for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (mail.greenbytes.de [217.91.35.233]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 47CE65F343 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 117) id D722F15A2FA7; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:06:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1512482775; bh=5mSfRKtRGY+O/fGx9rylxAkFuaX26Y34jU3drUDcOJs=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=XlTKFvUtMyt7BKmDHr5+zx0mQteuC3cL6gfg0STNxkoOSBR5p67qlabpJYTRIoGVP ltj+n30sw/e8IZZS5TVsH2VbRwNOA73EvtbaFHEMgxG+k25wK3aRpuzyQjDR9tsl9a V/j9rXPYxdVGvB2rWr1ER3KAKF6wx/F439uG9dZE= Received: from resistance.greenbytes.local (unknown [217.91.35.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5046515A0219 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:06:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1512482775; bh=5mSfRKtRGY+O/fGx9rylxAkFuaX26Y34jU3drUDcOJs=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=XlTKFvUtMyt7BKmDHr5+zx0mQteuC3cL6gfg0STNxkoOSBR5p67qlabpJYTRIoGVP ltj+n30sw/e8IZZS5TVsH2VbRwNOA73EvtbaFHEMgxG+k25wK3aRpuzyQjDR9tsl9a V/j9rXPYxdVGvB2rWr1ER3KAKF6wx/F439uG9dZE= From: Stefan Eissing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Subject: Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:06:14 +0100 References: <463DAA1F-5DE5-4AD4-B701-62B3386DF70D@greenbytes.de> To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) archived-at: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:06:26 -0000 ? > Am 05.12.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Luca Toscano : >=20 > Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going to = use for SSLPolicy?=20 >=20 > Luca >=20 > 2017-12-05 14:47 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing = : > Totally agree with you. If you make a better proposal that avoids = existing overlaps, I might just pick it up. >=20 > -Stefan >=20 > > Am 05.12.2017 um 14:40 schrieb Luca Toscano = : > > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > 2017-12-04 14:16 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing = : > > Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to = keep ' > > > I propose the following changes: > > > > 1. The simple, single line 'ManagedDomain' will be renamed to = 'MDGroup' > > > > I personally find the renaming a bit confusing, since visually there = is no affinity between and MDGroup, but I liked the = previous naming so I might be biased. If the majority thinks this is the = way to go I am fine with it, just wanted to express my opinion :) > > > > Luca > > >=20 >=20