Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Question about r1496711 which has been silently merged into 2.4.x
 branch
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:46:40 +0100
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <oth3c7$tm5$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <otdn3i$m0e$1@blaine.gmane.org>
 <CALK=YjPs4ugVaS_P0vCU0Bx2fdCF9pfeqaFapHUVT9bwhB1dow@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <CALK=YjPs4ugVaS_P0vCU0Bx2fdCF9pfeqaFapHUVT9bwhB1dow@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: fr
archived-at: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 06:46:53 -0000

Le 02/11/2017 à 01:56, Eric Covener a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> not sure on how to deal with the following issue. It has been found in a
>> review of some trunk/CHANGES entries in order to remove some backported
>> items.
>>
>>
>> In commit r1772331, r1496711 has been silently merged into the 2.4.x branch.
>>
>> CHANGES for r149671 is:
>>
>>    *) mod_file_cache: mod_file_cache should be able to serve files that
>>       haven't had a Content-Type set via e.g. mod_mime. [Eric Covener]
>>
>>
>> Should this be:
>>     [1] reverted
>>     [2] added in the CHANGES of 2.4.x in the revision where it has been
>> released
>>     [3] voted to keep track of it afterward
>>     [4] updated in the r1772331 commit message
>> ?
>>
>> My guess is [2]+[4]+removal from trunk/CHANGES.
>>
> I think that's best as well. Thanks for catching it.
>
> I vaguely recall that I later found things that made mod_file_cache
> almost certainly unused in practice.
>
Updated